Designing for Low-Volume Production: What Changes?

Nov 26, 2025 9:00:00 AM | Engineering Design Designing for Low-Volume Production: What Changes?

Designing for low-volume production is different from mass manufacturing. Learn how to optimise materials, modular design & costs when producing 10–200 parts.

Most design guides assume high-volume, mass manufacturing. But when you only need 10–200 parts, your design approach should shift dramatically.
Low-volume production — for testing, pilot runs, niche products, early market entry, or bridge manufacturing — requires different decisions around materials, tooling, cost, finish, and production methods.

This is where designers can gain massive advantages by optimising early for low-volume.


1. Batch Size Changes Everything

Why 10–200 parts is a unique window

  • Too small for injection moulding to be economical.

  • Too large for inefficient, slow prototyping methods.

  • Exactly the sweet spot for additive manufacturing, vacuum casting, and hybrid workflows.

Design implications

  • You can prioritise faster iteration over complex tooling.

  • Part designs can afford to be updated between batches.

  • You can avoid mould splits, draft angles, ejector marks and other constraints of mass production.

  • Tolerances, geometry, and features can be far more flexible.


2. Tooling Requirements Are Very Different

No need for expensive hard tooling

For low-volume, you can often avoid:

  • Steel moulds

  • Injection tooling

  • Multi-cavity moulds

  • Long lead times

What you need

  • 3D printed masters for vacuum casting

  • Soft tooling (silicone moulds)

  • Modular jigs and fixtures made via AM

  • Design considerations for castability or printability

Design Takeaway

Your design becomes tooling-light, which:

  • Reduces upfront cost

  • Speeds up time-to-market

  • Gives freedom to experiment


3. Modular Design Becomes Your Best Friend

Low-volume manufacturing is ideal for modular products.

Why modularity wins here:

  • Reduces cost by reusing standard components

  • Allows easier updates to individual sections

  • Helps separate cosmetic from structural elements

  • Enables multi-process workflows:

    • Printed core + cast outer shell

    • Machined bracket + printed housing

Design strategies:

  • Break parts into assemblies that suit different manufacturing methods

  • Use standard fixings to avoid custom tooling

  • Allow outer components to change without affecting internal structure


4. Materials Choices Are Broader Than You Think

In low-volume, you’re not restricted by:

  • Resin availability for injection moulding

  • High MOQs

  • Standardised moulding grades

Instead, you can choose materials based on:

  • Performance

  • Aesthetics

  • Cost

  • Speed

  • Post-processing compatibility

Examples

  • SLS / MJF nylon for durable end-use parts

  • SLA for cosmetic housings

  • Vacuum casting resins designed to mimic:

    • ABS

    • PC

    • PP

    • Elastomers (Shore A)

Key Design Considerations

  • Wall thickness variation is more forgiving

  • You can choose materials for prototype → production consistency

  • Colour matching and textures become post-processing decisions
    rather than moulding constraints


5. Scaling: Small Batches Are Easy to Repeat, Not Always Easy to Scale

When designing for 10–200 units, always consider:

Can this process scale to 500+ if needed?

  • SLS/MJF scales well in batches

  • Vacuum casting scales until mould life ends (20–25 pulls per mould)

  • Machining scales with fixture optimisation

  • SLA scales for cosmetic components but not high-wear parts

Design for scalable workflow:

  • Shared geometries across parts

  • Reduced complex internal features

  • Designing “future moulding ready” versions for later mass-production

  • Keeping options open to transition to injection moulding


6. Cost vs Speed: The Balancing Act

Design choices affect cost instantly

For low-volume manufacturing:

  • Fewer parts = lower assembly time

  • Simple geometries = faster prints

  • Avoiding over-engineering = less post-processing

  • Split large designs into efficient printable sections

Prioritising speed

  • Think “what gets us to test or market fastest?”

  • Use AM for detailed features

  • Use casting for repeatability & finish

  • Design with minimal supports & less finishing work

Prioritising cost

  • Consolidate assemblies

  • Use standard components

  • Remove expensive-to-finish surfaces

  • Choose materials with good print efficiency


7. When to Use AME-3D for Low-Volume Production

Ideal when you need:

  • Repeatable batches

  • Cosmetic-quality finishes

  • Strong, proof-of-concept housings

  • Elastomer or ABS-like cast components

  • Rapid design iteration + full production

Your competitive advantage

AME-3D can support the entire journey:

  • Concept → CAD

  • Design for low-volume

  • Functional prototypes

  • End-use parts

  • Finishing

  • Short-run production with multiple processes in-house


Conclusion

Designing for low-volume production isn’t a cut-down version of designing for mass production — it’s a different discipline altogether.
When designers embrace the flexibility of AM and vacuum casting, they unlock:

  • Faster development

  • Lower costs

  • Better design freedom

  • A product that can get to market (or testing) far sooner

AME-3D sits right at the heart of that opportunity. Need help starting your project? Contact us today.

AME-3D

Written By: AME-3D

We are a manufacturing business based in Sheffield, UK. Providing 3D printing, rapid prototyping & production to businesses.